12 Data Science Futures

Week 12:
TL;DR: read data science scandals, write your own final prompt
readings (links) & lectures ~ assignments due ~ live session agenda


Predictive Policing is [Already a Thing](https://www.predpol.com)

Figure 33: Predictive Policing is Already a Thing

This week we’re reading about the ethical responsibilities and implications of data science. Pay attention to the logic of arguments made. How do we establish accurate expectations about the consequences of data science without teetering too close to the edge of the sci-fi slippery slope? Scandal comes in three flavors.

First, Duhigg (2012) a classic marketing “scandal” involving Target that will be closer to what many data scientists imagine they would want to do with consumer data. Pay attention to the style of The New York Times Magazine especially in its orientation to the truth–compare it to the style of truth you find in The New York Times newspaper article about Cambridge Analytica.

We’ve discussed the scandal potential of Facebook as a data analyzer. Recently we’ve learned a lot about the scandal potential of Facebook as a data vendor. Take a look at recent press releases from Analytica (2018) responding to the political and media cycle set of by Rosenberg, Confessore, and Cadwalladr (2018). How does the ontology of the debate (fundamental categories of what is real or legitimate) differ between the accuser and the accused? Where are the data scientists located in the story, and what are their roles, exposures, and responsiblities?

Finally, consider whether we’re approaching the world described by Joy (2000) in light of a recent tragedy (Hawkins 2018) involving self-driving cars.

Week 12 "reading" time estimated at 250 words per minute

Figure 34: Week 12 “reading” time estimated at 250 words per minute

Readings


Duhigg (2012) ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
ψ β NA NA

Hawkins (2018) ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
ν ω NA NA

Joy (2000) ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
τ π NA NA

Rosenberg, Confessore, and Cadwalladr (2018) ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
β φ NA NA

Lectures

  • ↓ 12.1 Introduction to Ethics and Privacy
  • ↓ 12.2 Weekly Video
  • ↓ 12.3 Assigned Readings
  • ↓ 12.4 Law vs. Ethics
  • ↓ 12.5 Experiences and Concerns Around Data
  • ↓ 12.5.1 Watson and the Department of Defense
  • ↓ 12.5.2 The Bill Joy Argument
  • ↓ 12.6 Minority Report
  • ↓ 12.7 Vectors of Data Science
  • ↓ 12.8 Why Companies Imagine Futures
  • ↓ 12.9 A View From Herman Miller
  • ↓ 12.10 Week 12 Wrap-Up

12.1 Introduction to Ethics and Privacy ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
τ φ NA NA

12.2 Weekly Video ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
ω ο NA NA

12.3 Assigned Readings ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
θ τ NA NA

12.4 Law vs. Ethics ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
π ψ NA NA

12.5 Experiences and Concerns Around Data ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
θ μ NA NA

12.5.1 Watson and the Department of Defense ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
β λ NA NA

12.5.2 The Bill Joy Argument ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
υ ω NA NA

12.6 Minority Report ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
φ ψ NA NA

12.7 Vectors of Data Science ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
ο α NA NA

12.8 Why Companies Imagine Futures ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
ξ ω NA NA

12.9 A View From Herman Miller ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
θ α NA NA

12.10 Week 12 Wrap-Up ↑

Players Slug Excerpt
ι φ NA NA

Bibliography

Duhigg, Charles. 2012. “How Companies Learn Your Secrets.” The New York Times, February. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits.html.

Analytica, Cambridge. 2018. “News CA Commercial.” Accessed March 20. https://ca-commercial.com/news.

Rosenberg, Matthew, Nicholas Confessore, and Carole Cadwalladr. 2018. “How Trump Consultants Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions.” New York Times (Online). https://search.proquest.com/docview/2014763778.

Joy, Bill. 2000. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/.

Hawkins, Andrew J. 2018. “Uber’s Self-Driving Car Showed No Signs of Slowing Before Fatal Crash, Police Say.” The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/19/17140936/uber-self-driving-crash-death-homeless-arizona.